• home
  • Bio
  • Core Values
  • News Articles
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Impaired Driving
  • Immediate Roadside Prohibition
  • Domestic Assault
  • Drug Charges
  • Bail Hearing
  • Legal Aid
  • FAQs
  • Steinbach
  • Contact
Menu

Michael Dyck | Criminal Law

Rees Dyck Rogala
Law Offices
(204) 318-6116

Michael Dyck | Criminal Law

  • home
  • about
    • Bio
    • Core Values
    • News Articles
    • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • info
    • Impaired Driving
    • Immediate Roadside Prohibition
    • Domestic Assault
    • Drug Charges
    • Bail Hearing
    • Legal Aid
    • FAQs
  • Steinbach
  • Contact

Can you have pot in your car?

March 27, 2019 Michael Dyck
Pot Marijuana Car Vehicle Michael Dyck lawyer

Is it against the law to have marijuana in my car? Can you have weed in your car? When marijuana was legalized in Canada, a lot of laws had to be created or updated. Although there have been concerns about impaired driving from marijuana, there doesn’t seem to be a big increase in those types of charges. However, between October 2018 and February 2019, about 75% of cannabis related driving charges/tickets issued to Manitobans were for illegally transporting marijuana and 20% were for consuming marijuana in a vehicle (Drunk and distracted driving eclipse cannabis offences on Manitoba roads 4 months after legalization, CBC News). Anyone that plans on purchasing or consuming marijuana in Manitoba should know how these laws work so you can avoid unnecessary fines.

First of all, laws can be different all over Canada, so be aware the information on this page applies to the Province of Manitoba. Laws can also change over time and this information was accurate as of March 2019.

Most people don’t know these rules, which is why there are so many tickets being handed out. You should share this page with your friends and family so they don’t get a ticket.


Consequences for transporting marijuana illegally

If you are charged with improper transport of marijuana in Manitoba you are facing a $237 fine (government website link) and you will lose 2 points on the driver safety scale from Manitoba Public Insurance (MPI).

I think the best way to avoid a fine and demerits would be to avoid transporting marijuana in a vehicle at all by ordering your marijuana products online from a company like Delta 9 and then have it delivered to your house. In Winnipeg, some delivery companies work with companies like Delta 9 to do same day deliveries for marijuana purchases and you can choose that in your cart as you checkout. (You still have to remember to follow the transportation laws if you plan on bringing marijuana and driving to a friend’s place.) You can also check out a blog post that Delta 9 wrote about transporting cannabis in Canada.

Delta 9 Cannabis

Best option

Order marijuana online from Delta 9 and get it delivered to your house


1. Legal rule - HTA Law

We need to start by looking at The Highway Traffic Act (HTA) in Manitoba, which changed on December 1, 2017 to include new provisions about having marijuana in vehicles. Section 213 has all the information about marijuana (as well as where and how you should transport liquor or alcohol in a vehicle). Section 213.1(1) says:

  • No person shall drive or have the care or control of a vehicle on a highway if there is cannabis in or on the vehicle, whether or not the vehicle is in motion

1. Lawyer to human translation

The default position is that it you're breaking the law under the HTA if you have marijuana in or on your vehicle, even if the vehicle is parked. But there have to be exceptions so that you can legally transport marijuana after you purchase it from the store. Things that only use muscle power, like bicycles and skateboards, do not meet the definition of “vehicle” so you can have marijuana in your pocket or bag.


2. Legal rule - exception for regular vehicles

  • Subsection (1) does not apply if (a) the vehicle is a motor vehicle — other than a motor vehicle used for the transportation of persons for compensation — and
    (i) the cannabis is stored in the trunk, an exterior compartment on the vehicle or another space designed for the carriage of goods or baggage that is not readily accessible to any person in the motor vehicle,
    (ii) if the motor vehicle is a station wagon, van, sport utility vehicle, crossover or hatchback style of vehicle, the cannabis is stored behind the rear of the last seat in the vehicle, whether or not that seat is in an upright position, or
    (iii) if the motor vehicle is a motor home, the cannabis is stored in a cabinet or other storage compartment away from the driver's area

2. Lawyer to human translation

If you are not paying someone to give you a ride (like a bus, taxi, or a ride-sharing company like Uber), then you have to treat marijuana the exact same way as you would treat open liquor. It doesn’t matter if the marijuana container is brand new from the store or already opened, you always have to treat marijuana in a regular vehicle like you would treat open liquor. For more details about open vs. closed liquor and where you can store it, you can check out my blog post "Can you have alcohol in your car?"

Pot Marijuana Car Michael Dyck lawyer

In a car

Store marijuana in the trunk or on a rooftop carrier

Pot Marijuana Car Vehicle Michael Dyck lawyer

In a truck or motorcycle

Store marijuana in the bed of the truck or an exterior compartment

Pot Marijuana SUV Vehicle Michael Dyck lawyer

In a van or SUV

Store marijuana behind the last row of seats

Pot Marijuana Motor Home RV Michael Dyck lawyer

In a motor home

Store marijuana in a cabinet or container out of reach of the driver


3. Legal rule - exception for paid trips in vehicles

  • Subsection (1) does not apply if (b) the vehicle is a motor vehicle used for the transportation of persons for compensation and the cannabis is in the possession of a passenger and carried on the passenger's person or in the passenger's personal effects

3. Lawyer to human translation

If you are a passenger and you are paying the driver for a ride (like a bus, taxi, or a ride-sharing company like Uberr), then you must keep the marijuana with you and store it in your pocket or in your bag.

If you are a passenger and you are just getting a ride in your friend’s vehicle, you have to follow the default rules (above) and store marijuana the same way you would store open liquor.

IMG_0334.jpg

Paid rides

Store marijuana in your pocket or bag


4. Legal rule - off road vehicles

Subsection (1) of the HTA does not apply if you follow subsection (c):

  • the vehicle is an off-road vehicle and the cannabis is transported in compliance with section 31.2 of The Off-Road Vehicles Act

So then we have to go and look at section 31.2 of The Off-Road Vehicles Act which says:

  • No person shall operate an off-road vehicle if there is cannabis in or on the vehicle, unless the cannabis is stored in an exterior compartment on the vehicle or another space designed for the carriage of goods or baggage that is not readily accessible to any person in or on the vehicle

4. Lawyer to human translation

If you are using an off road vehicle like an ATV, dirt bike, or quad, then you must store marijuana in a storage compartment on the vehicle that the driver cannot easily get to or access. The idea behind the law is to avoid a driver being able to quickly access some marijuana. So, you cannot have marijuana in your pocket or in your backpack if you're driving an off road vehicle.

Pot Marijuana ATV Vehicle Michael Dyck lawyer

Off road vehicles

Store marijuana in an exterior compartment or a bag that you cannot access quickly


5. Legal rule - power-assisted bicycle

  • Subsection (1) does not apply if (d) the vehicle is a power-assisted bicycle

5. Lawyer to human translation

You can have marijuana in or on a power-assisted bicycle, like a bicycle with a small motor but this does NOT include a scooter or a motorcycle. If you are on a power-assisted bicycle, then you are allowed to have marijuana in your pocket or in your backpack/bag. Remember, a regular bicycle has no special rules about transporting marijuana because it does not meet the definition of vehicle.


6. Legal rule - trailers

  • Subsection (1) does not apply if (d.1) the vehicle is a trailer

6. Lawyer to human translation

This is pretty striaghtforward, you can have marijuana in a trailer.


7. Legal rule - boats

The Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Control Act describes the law about marijuana in boats in section 101.26(1):

  • (1) A person must not operate or have the care and control of a boat while there is cannabis in the boat, unless the cannabis is stored in a closed compartment in the boat

  • (2) In subsection (1), "boat" means any type of craft or vessel that is designed or used to travel on water

7. Lawyer to human translation

Because the definition of boat is pretty broad, you have to remember that a boat would include non-motarized vessels like canoes or kayaks even. You just have to make sure the marijuana is in a closed compartment, like a storage compartment on a motor boat or a plastic container in a canoe.

Pot Marijuana boats Vehicle Michael Dyck lawyer

Boats

Store marijuana in a closed compartment in the boat


If you are not driving, can you consume marijuana in your vehicle?

Section 213.2 of the HTA in Manitoba is pretty clear and it says:

  • No person shall inhale, ingest or otherwise consume cannabis in or on a motor vehicle, farm tractor, implement of husbandry or special mobile machine on a highway.

Section 31.3 of The Off-Road Vehicles Act has a similar section and it says:

  • No person shall inhale, ingest or otherwise consume cannabis in or on an off-road vehicle, whether or not the vehicle is in motion.

So, the answer is no. To put it bluntly, no hotboxing. It doesn't matter if you are driving or if the vehicle is parked, you are not allowed to consume marijuana in a motor vehicle. This includes any and all ways of consuming marijuana (e.g. smoking pot, eating edibles). The law also says "on" a vehicle, so you cannot sit on the tailgate of your pick-up truck and smoke a joint either.

If you are charged with with consuming marijuana in or on a vehicle, you are facing a $672 fine (government website link).


The two main lessons to learn from this post are that you always need to treat marijuana in a vehicle like you would treat open liquor and you cannot consume marijuana in (or on) a vehicle at all - even if you’re not planning on driving anywhere. I’m a criminal defence lawyer and I found it time consuming to actually locate all the laws about transporting cannabis in Manitoba. In fact, the laws are split over 3 different pieces of legislation, so you cannot even find all the answers in one spot. However, the rules themselves are not hard to follow if you know them and understand them. Police officers could just sit in their cruiser cars outside cannabis stores and then ticket people that get in their vehicle without loading anything into the back or the trunk. Be sure to tell your friends or family about these rules and share this blog post with them so they can avoid the headache of dealing with the police and a ticket.

Latest blog posts
Police Drop Charges.jpg
Jun 28, 2022
Can you ask police to drop charges?
Jun 28, 2022
Jun 28, 2022
Charter Rights in Canada.jpg
Jun 28, 2022
Does Canada have a version of Miranda rights?
Jun 28, 2022
Jun 28, 2022
Michael Dyck domestic violence.jpeg
May 16, 2022
What is all included in domestic violence?
May 16, 2022
May 16, 2022
What should you NOT do during a traffic stop?
Dec 1, 2020
What should you NOT do during a traffic stop?
Dec 1, 2020
Dec 1, 2020
Manitoba Court Closures (Coronavirus / COVID 19 Response) - Fall 2020
Nov 16, 2020
Manitoba Court Closures (Coronavirus / COVID 19 Response) - Fall 2020
Nov 16, 2020
Nov 16, 2020
Finding the Best Criminal Lawyer - Is Your Lawyer Legit or Full of It?
Jul 28, 2020
Finding the Best Criminal Lawyer - Is Your Lawyer Legit or Full of It?
Jul 28, 2020
Jul 28, 2020
Why Would I Need an Affidavit?
Apr 17, 2020
Why Would I Need an Affidavit?
Apr 17, 2020
Apr 17, 2020
Where can I find a notary public?
Mar 31, 2020
Where can I find a notary public?
Mar 31, 2020
Mar 31, 2020
Manitoba Court Closures (Coronavirus / COVID 19 Response)
Mar 17, 2020
Manitoba Court Closures (Coronavirus / COVID 19 Response)
Mar 17, 2020
Mar 17, 2020
Rees Dyck Rogala Law Offices
Dec 31, 2019
Rees Dyck Rogala Law Offices
Dec 31, 2019
Dec 31, 2019
Can you have pot in your car?
Mar 27, 2019
Can you have pot in your car?
Mar 27, 2019
Mar 27, 2019
Big DUI Change That Will Impact All Canadians
Dec 18, 2018
Big DUI Change That Will Impact All Canadians
Dec 18, 2018
Dec 18, 2018
MAJOR UPDATE: Cell Phones and Driving in Manitoba (August 2018)
Aug 26, 2018
MAJOR UPDATE: Cell Phones and Driving in Manitoba (August 2018)
Aug 26, 2018
Aug 26, 2018
Michael Dyck drive impaired marijuana pot
Jun 22, 2018
TV Appearance: CTV Winnipeg Marijuana Impaired Driving
Jun 22, 2018
Jun 22, 2018
Michael Dyck First DUI Cost Manitoba
Jun 19, 2018
How much does your first DUI cost in Manitoba - Infographic
Jun 19, 2018
Jun 19, 2018
How much does it cost if you get a DUI? (And why it is cheaper to hire a helicopter)
Jun 19, 2018
How much does it cost if you get a DUI? (And why it is cheaper to hire a helicopter)
Jun 19, 2018
Jun 19, 2018
Can you have alcohol in your car?
Apr 2, 2018
Can you have alcohol in your car?
Apr 2, 2018
Apr 2, 2018
Michael Dyck news
Jan 30, 2018
Mix 96 Steinbach Guest Spot: Drinking and Driving Costs
Jan 30, 2018
Jan 30, 2018
Preventing a Break and Enter in Your Home: Tips From a Criminal Defence Lawyer
Jul 24, 2017
Preventing a Break and Enter in Your Home: Tips From a Criminal Defence Lawyer
Jul 24, 2017
Jul 24, 2017
Fort Richmond Collegiate: May 19, 2017 Presentation
May 19, 2017
Fort Richmond Collegiate: May 19, 2017 Presentation
May 19, 2017
May 19, 2017
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Oland (Bail Pending Appeal)
Mar 24, 2017
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Oland (Bail Pending Appeal)
Mar 24, 2017
Mar 24, 2017
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Bingley (DRE Experts)
Feb 24, 2017
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Bingley (DRE Experts)
Feb 24, 2017
Feb 24, 2017
Steinbach Regional Secondary School: November 16, 2016
Nov 16, 2016
Steinbach Regional Secondary School: November 16, 2016
Nov 16, 2016
Nov 16, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Anthony-Cook (Joint Recommendations)
Oct 24, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Anthony-Cook (Joint Recommendations)
Oct 24, 2016
Oct 24, 2016
Maclean's Article Tackles Impaired Driving by Drug Issue
Oct 7, 2016
Maclean's Article Tackles Impaired Driving by Drug Issue
Oct 7, 2016
Oct 7, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Jordan (Unreasonable Delay)
Jul 8, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Jordan (Unreasonable Delay)
Jul 8, 2016
Jul 8, 2016
Cell Phones and Driving in Manitoba (June 2016 Update)
Jun 25, 2016
Cell Phones and Driving in Manitoba (June 2016 Update)
Jun 25, 2016
Jun 25, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Safarzadeh-Markhali (Pre-Sentence Custody Credit)
Apr 16, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Safarzadeh-Markhali (Pre-Sentence Custody Credit)
Apr 16, 2016
Apr 16, 2016
Winnipeg Police - Lie Detector Test
Mar 31, 2016
Winnipeg Police - Lie Detector Test
Mar 31, 2016
Mar 31, 2016
Is Marijuana Use Impaired Driving?
Jan 23, 2016
Is Marijuana Use Impaired Driving?
Jan 23, 2016
Jan 23, 2016

Related articles

  • Can you have alcohol in your car?

  • Impaired Driving or DUIs

  • MAJOR UPDATE: Cell Phones and Driving in Manitoba (August 2018)

  • Is Marijuana Use Impaired Driving

  • Big DUI Change That Will Impact All Canadians

About the author

Michael Dyck is a partner at Rees & Dyck Criminal Defence. He represents clients primarily from Winnipeg, Steinbach, and rural Manitoba. He has extensive experience helping people charged with criminal offences and focuses on building legal strategy with clients. To read more of his articles, please visit his partner's website TomRees.ca.

Tags impaired driving law, drive impaired, DUI, high driving, marijuana, criminal defence, driving laws, Highway Traffic Act, Manitoba
5 Comments

TV Appearance: CTV Winnipeg Marijuana Impaired Driving

June 22, 2018 Michael Dyck
Michael Dyck drive impaired marijuana pot

I was recently featured on a short segment for CTV Winnipeg discussing some of the pitfalls of the recently passed legislation legalizing marijuana and creating new impaired driving offences related to marijuana impaired driving. Click here to check out the news article and TV segment.

Related articles

  • Is Marijuana Use Impaired Driving (michaeldyck.ca)
  • Maclean's Article Tackles Impaired Driving by Drug Issue (michaeldyck.ca)
  • Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Bingley (DRE Experts) (michaeldyck.ca)
  • How much does it cost if you get a DUI? (And why it is cheaper to hire a helicopter) (michaeldyck.ca)
  • Impaired Driving or DUIs (michaeldyck.ca)

About the author

Michael Dyck is a partner at Rees & Dyck Criminal Defence. He represents clients primarily from Winnipeg, Steinbach, and rural Manitoba. He has extensive experience helping people charged with criminal offences and focuses on building legal strategy with clients. To read more of his articles, please visit his partner's website TomRees.ca.

Tags DUI, impaired driving law, drive impaired, driving laws, high driving, criminal law, criminal defence, marijuana
Comment

Can you have alcohol in your car?

April 2, 2018 Michael Dyck
alcohol car Michael Dyck 1.JPG

Can I have open liquor in a vehicle in Manitoba? Is it against the law to have alcohol in your car? Can I have open alcohol in my trunk? As the go-to lawyer for most of my friends and family, these types of questions have come up lately. And it makes sense. People want to make sure they are following the rules and the the law can get complicated in the area of drinking and driving. I have handled many drive impaired cases and open liquor tickets in Winnipeg and across Manitoba, so here's what you need to know.

First of all, laws can be different all over Canada, so be aware the information on this page applies to the Province of Manitoba. Laws can also change over time, so this information was accurate as of April 2018.


1. Legal rule - HTA Law

We need to start by looking at The Highway Traffic Act (HTA) in Manitoba and section 213(1) that says:

  • No person shall cause, permit, or suffer any liquor, as defined in The Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Control Act, to be in a vehicle upon a highway contrary to any provision of that Act.

1. Lawyer to human translation

That really isn't very helpful. Basically it tells us that we have to look at The Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Control Act (LGCCA). If you break the rules under the LGCCA, then you're breaking this rule in the HTA. 


2. Legal rule - LGCCA General Law (Motor Vehicles)

Section 60 in the LGCCA talks about liquor in motor vehicles: 

  • 60(1) A person must not drive or have the care and control of a motor vehicle, whether or not the motor vehicle is in motion, if there is liquor in the motor vehicle, unless the motor vehicle is the subject of a licence or permit.

2. Lawyer to human translation

This sets out the main rule which is NO LIQUOR in a vehicle at all unless you have a licence/permit. Liquor means anything with 1% of alcohol or more (obviously this includes all spirits, wine, and beer). But don't panic, you haven't been accidentally breaking the law your whole life because there are several exceptions that we will talk about shortly. Remember that even if you aren't driving your car, you still have to follow these rules. If you're leaving some liquor in your car overnight or you are loading up your car after your visit to the MLCC, you must store your alcohol properly and follow these rules.


3. Legal rule - Closed Liquor (Any Motor Vehicle)

  • 60(2) Subsection (1) does not apply (a) if the liquor is in a bottle, can or container that has not been opened or unsealed;

3. Lawyer to human translation

If you haven't opened the liquor and you haven't broken the seal on the liquor, then it is considered CLOSED LIQUOR and you can have it in anywhere in your car. So, as long as you haven't been cracking the seal between the store and your car, then you have been following the law this whole time.

alcohol car Michael Dyck 2.JPG

Closed liquor

The container has never been opened & the seal is not broken

alcohol car Michael Dyck 3.JPG

In a vehicle

You can have closed liquor anywhere in a car, truck, or SUV


4. Legal rule - Open Liquor (Car, Truck)

  • 60(2) Subsection (1) does not apply (b) if the liquor is stored in the trunk, an exterior compartment on the vehicle or another space designed for the carriage of goods or baggage that is not readily accessible to any person in the motor vehicle;

4. Lawyer to human translation

If you have OPEN LIQUOR, its time to pay attention. Open liquor must be kept it in the trunk of your car, the bed of your truck, or in a rooftop carrier. You can also store it in the back of the vehicle if the liquor isn't easy to get at by the driver or passengers in the vehicle. But what about SUVs and vans? That's part of the very next rule, so keep reading.

alcohol car Michael Dyck 4.JPG

Open liquor

You have opened the container (doesn't matter if it is still full or not)

alcohol car Michael Dyck 5.JPG

In a car

Store open liquor in the trunk (or rooftop carrier)

alcohol car Michael Dyck 6.JPG

In a truck

Store open liquor in the bed of the truck (or rooftop carrier)


5. Legal rule - Open Liquor (Van, SUV)

  • 60(2) Subsection (1) does not apply (c) in the case of a motor vehicle that is a station wagon, van or hatchback style of vehicle, if the liquor is stored behind the rear of the last seat in the vehicle, whether or not that seat is in an upright position; or

5. Lawyer to human translation

If you have OPEN LIQUOR in a station wagon, van, hatchback, or SUV, then you have to put it behind the last set of rear seats (basically the trunk or back area). If you folded down the last set of rear seats, you have to make sure the liquor is remaining as close to the rear of the vehicle as possible. Basically, you can't fold down the seats so the alcohol can be closer to the driver inside the vehicle. But what about my motor home? You guessed it, that's the next section.

alcohol car Michael Dyck 7.JPG

In a van or SUV

Store open liquor behind the last row of seats


6. Legal rule - Open Liquor (Motor Home)

  • 60(2) Subsection (1) does not apply (d) in the case of a motor vehicle that is a motor home, if (i) it is being used as a residence, or (ii) the liquor is stored in a cabinet or other storage compartment away from the driver's area while the motor home is not being used as a residence.

6. Lawyer to human translation

If you're using your motor home as your living quarters or your residence (you're not driving it around), then you can have OPEN LIQUOR anywhere. If you're at a camp site and the motor home is parked for the night, then it is just like your home - you can have alcohol anywhere. If you're not using the motor home as your home/residence (basically, you're driving it), then OPEN LIQUOR must be in a cabinet or other area of the vehicle that is far away from the driver. 

alcohol car Michael Dyck 8.JPG

In a motor home

Store open liquor anywhere if you're not moving, but if you're moving then keep it away from the driver


7. Legal rule - Open Liquor (Taxi)

  • 60(3) The operator of a motor vehicle used for the transportation of persons for compensation must not transport liquor unless the liquor is in the possession of a passenger and is being transported in accordance with subsection (2).

7. Lawyer to human translation

Taxi drivers cannot have any liquor and have to make sure their passengers are following the rules for transporting open or closed liquor as outlined above.  

alcohol car Michael Dyck 9.JPG

In a taxi

Taxi drivers cannot have any liquor and taxi passengers have to follow the normal rules for open or closed liquor


8. Legal rule - LCGA General Law (Boats)

  • 61(1) A person must not operate or have the care and control of a boat while there is liquor in the boat, unless the boat is the subject of a licence or permit.

8. Lawyer to human translation

This sets out the main rule which is NO LIQUOR in a boat at all unless you have a licence/permit. Now again, there are some exceptions. Boats include anything that is used to travel on water so motorboats, canoes, and jet skis are all considered boats.


9. Legal rule - Closed Liquor (Boats)

  • 61(2) Subsection (1) does not apply (a) if the liquor is in a bottle, can or container that has not been opened or unsealed; or

9. Lawyer to human translation

Just like with motor vehicles, if you haven't opened the liquor and you haven't broken the seal on the liquor, then it is considered CLOSED LIQUOR and you can have it in anywhere in your boat.

alcohol car Michael Dyck 10.JPG

Closed liquor in a boat

You can have closed liquor anywhere in a boat


10. Legal rule - Open Liquor (Boats)

  • 61(2) Subsection (1) does not apply (b) if the liquor is stored in a closed compartment in the boat.

10. Lawyer to human translation

If you have OPEN LIQUOR, its time to pay attention again. Open liquor in a boat must be in a closed compartment or storage area in the boat. 

alcohol car Michael Dyck 11.JPG

Open liquor in a boat

You must store open liquor in a closed compatment or storage area on the boat


Is a single can of unopened beer/cooler open or closed liquor?

It is not 100% clear whether or not a single can of beer would meet the definition of open liquor or not. Some people would argue that the container is the cardboard box that beer cans comes in, so if the beer can is not in the cardboard box anymore or if the cardboard box is open, then it is open liquor. You can buy single cans at the Liquor Mart and then you do not get a cardboard box at all, so does that mean you are leaving the store with open liquor? Other people would argue that the purpose of the laws are to prevent people from consuming alcohol while in their vehicles. Therefore, if the can itself is not open, then it would be impossible to consume the contents - so as long as the can itself is sealed and closed, then it is closed liquor. So, there are arguments on both sides. It is a lot easier and cheaper to treat single cans as open liquor than it would be to get charged with an offence, proceed to trial, and then possibly win. So if you have a single can or a few single cans, treat it as open liquor and avoid the headaches of a ticket.

alcohol car Michael Dyck 12.JPG

Single can

Be safe rather than sorry, treat it like open liquor


Consequences If You're Guilty 

What kind of punishment you will get depends if you are charged under the HTA or the LGCCA. Let's start with the HTA. 

  • Summary conviction offence

  • 2015 Brown Book says the fine is a set amount of $237.50

  • Manitoba Public Insurance (MPI) will also deduct 2 points on your Driver Safety Scale (MPI Calculator)

What about the LGCCA? 

  • Summary conviction offence

  • (a) in the case of an individual, to a fine of not more than $50,000, imprisonment for up to six months, or both; and

  • (b) in the case of a corporation, to a fine of not more than $250,000.

Final Thoughts

There's a lot of things that you can do that are both completely legal and completely idiotic. In Canada, we have freedom of expression, so you're within your rights to tell the guy bench-pressing 225 lbs. at the gym that you think he's a wimp. Not a smart idea. Similarly, even though you can legally have closed liquor anywhere in a vehicle, it is always a good idea to keep it in the trunk/back and out of sight. You don't need the extra attention of a police officer that stops you when they see liquor in your vehicle. Be responsible.

Related articles

  • Impaired Driving or DUIs (michaeldyck.ca)

  • Trying to Beat the Breathalyzer Test (michaeldyck.ca)

  • Is Marijuana Use Impaired Driving (michaeldyck.ca)

  • Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Bingley (DRE Experts) (michaeldyck.ca)

About the author

Michael Dyck is a partner at Rees & Dyck Criminal Defence. He represents clients primarily from Winnipeg, Steinbach, and rural Manitoba. He has extensive experience helping people charged with criminal offences and focuses on building legal strategy with clients. To read more of his articles, please visit his partner's website TomRees.ca.

Latest Blog Posts
Police Drop Charges.jpg
Jun 28, 2022
Can you ask police to drop charges?
Jun 28, 2022
Jun 28, 2022
Charter Rights in Canada.jpg
Jun 28, 2022
Does Canada have a version of Miranda rights?
Jun 28, 2022
Jun 28, 2022
Michael Dyck domestic violence.jpeg
May 16, 2022
What is all included in domestic violence?
May 16, 2022
May 16, 2022
What should you NOT do during a traffic stop?
Dec 1, 2020
What should you NOT do during a traffic stop?
Dec 1, 2020
Dec 1, 2020
Manitoba Court Closures (Coronavirus / COVID 19 Response) - Fall 2020
Nov 16, 2020
Manitoba Court Closures (Coronavirus / COVID 19 Response) - Fall 2020
Nov 16, 2020
Nov 16, 2020
Finding the Best Criminal Lawyer - Is Your Lawyer Legit or Full of It?
Jul 28, 2020
Finding the Best Criminal Lawyer - Is Your Lawyer Legit or Full of It?
Jul 28, 2020
Jul 28, 2020
Why Would I Need an Affidavit?
Apr 17, 2020
Why Would I Need an Affidavit?
Apr 17, 2020
Apr 17, 2020
Where can I find a notary public?
Mar 31, 2020
Where can I find a notary public?
Mar 31, 2020
Mar 31, 2020
Manitoba Court Closures (Coronavirus / COVID 19 Response)
Mar 17, 2020
Manitoba Court Closures (Coronavirus / COVID 19 Response)
Mar 17, 2020
Mar 17, 2020
Rees Dyck Rogala Law Offices
Dec 31, 2019
Rees Dyck Rogala Law Offices
Dec 31, 2019
Dec 31, 2019
Can you have pot in your car?
Mar 27, 2019
Can you have pot in your car?
Mar 27, 2019
Mar 27, 2019
Big DUI Change That Will Impact All Canadians
Dec 18, 2018
Big DUI Change That Will Impact All Canadians
Dec 18, 2018
Dec 18, 2018
MAJOR UPDATE: Cell Phones and Driving in Manitoba (August 2018)
Aug 26, 2018
MAJOR UPDATE: Cell Phones and Driving in Manitoba (August 2018)
Aug 26, 2018
Aug 26, 2018
Michael Dyck drive impaired marijuana pot
Jun 22, 2018
TV Appearance: CTV Winnipeg Marijuana Impaired Driving
Jun 22, 2018
Jun 22, 2018
Michael Dyck First DUI Cost Manitoba
Jun 19, 2018
How much does your first DUI cost in Manitoba - Infographic
Jun 19, 2018
Jun 19, 2018
How much does it cost if you get a DUI? (And why it is cheaper to hire a helicopter)
Jun 19, 2018
How much does it cost if you get a DUI? (And why it is cheaper to hire a helicopter)
Jun 19, 2018
Jun 19, 2018
Can you have alcohol in your car?
Apr 2, 2018
Can you have alcohol in your car?
Apr 2, 2018
Apr 2, 2018
Michael Dyck news
Jan 30, 2018
Mix 96 Steinbach Guest Spot: Drinking and Driving Costs
Jan 30, 2018
Jan 30, 2018
Preventing a Break and Enter in Your Home: Tips From a Criminal Defence Lawyer
Jul 24, 2017
Preventing a Break and Enter in Your Home: Tips From a Criminal Defence Lawyer
Jul 24, 2017
Jul 24, 2017
Fort Richmond Collegiate: May 19, 2017 Presentation
May 19, 2017
Fort Richmond Collegiate: May 19, 2017 Presentation
May 19, 2017
May 19, 2017
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Oland (Bail Pending Appeal)
Mar 24, 2017
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Oland (Bail Pending Appeal)
Mar 24, 2017
Mar 24, 2017
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Bingley (DRE Experts)
Feb 24, 2017
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Bingley (DRE Experts)
Feb 24, 2017
Feb 24, 2017
Steinbach Regional Secondary School: November 16, 2016
Nov 16, 2016
Steinbach Regional Secondary School: November 16, 2016
Nov 16, 2016
Nov 16, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Anthony-Cook (Joint Recommendations)
Oct 24, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Anthony-Cook (Joint Recommendations)
Oct 24, 2016
Oct 24, 2016
Maclean's Article Tackles Impaired Driving by Drug Issue
Oct 7, 2016
Maclean's Article Tackles Impaired Driving by Drug Issue
Oct 7, 2016
Oct 7, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Jordan (Unreasonable Delay)
Jul 8, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Jordan (Unreasonable Delay)
Jul 8, 2016
Jul 8, 2016
Cell Phones and Driving in Manitoba (June 2016 Update)
Jun 25, 2016
Cell Phones and Driving in Manitoba (June 2016 Update)
Jun 25, 2016
Jun 25, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Safarzadeh-Markhali (Pre-Sentence Custody Credit)
Apr 16, 2016
Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Safarzadeh-Markhali (Pre-Sentence Custody Credit)
Apr 16, 2016
Apr 16, 2016
Winnipeg Police - Lie Detector Test
Mar 31, 2016
Winnipeg Police - Lie Detector Test
Mar 31, 2016
Mar 31, 2016
Is Marijuana Use Impaired Driving?
Jan 23, 2016
Is Marijuana Use Impaired Driving?
Jan 23, 2016
Jan 23, 2016
Tags impaired driving law, drive impaired, drive over .08, drunk driving, DUI, R. v. Bingley, high driving, marijuana, criminal law, criminal defence, driving laws, Highway Traffic Act, Manitoba, Manitoba Public Insurance
8 Comments

Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Bingley (DRE Experts)

February 24, 2017 Michael Dyck
Michael Dyck R. v. Bingley Supreme Court of Canada

On February 23, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada released its 5-2 majority decision in R. v. Bingley, 2017 SCC 12. 

This is a case about impaired driving by a drug, specifically marijuana and a prescription drug Xanax. First, you will need a bit of a background about drive impaired by drug cases and law in order to understand the issue the Supreme Court addressed.

If the police pull you over while driving or find you in the driver's seat of a motor vehicle and the police reasonably suspect you have a drug or alcohol in your body, then they can demand and force you to complete either a Standardized Field Sobriety Test or to provide a sample into a roadside alcohol screening device called an Approved Screening Device (ASD). If you fail either of these tests, the officer will then place you under arrest for impaired operation and then demand you complete either a Drug Recognition Evaluation or a breathalyzer sample back at the police detachment. But, if the office has reasonable grounds to believe your ability to operate a motor vehicle is impaired, even to a slight degree, because of the effects of a drug or alcohol or both, then the officer will place you under arrest immediately and take you to the police detachment for the Drug Recognition Evaluation or a breathalyzer sample.

Police officers need to take special training to complete Standardized Field Sobriety Tests, ASD tests, Drug Recognition Evaluation tests, or a breathalyzer test so some officers may have training to do some or none of these types of tests. If police officers complete special training for drug evaluations, they can call themselves a "Drug Recognition Expert" (DRE) because that is the term the Criminal Code uses for them.

In court, most of the time, witnesses testify about things that they said, they saw, and they did. In other words, their direct observations. Additionally, opinion evidence can also be provided by witnesses. Some opinion evidence is consider lay opinion, which means anyone can give opinion evidence about these areas. Anyone can testify in court about how old they think someone appeared or how intoxicated they thought someone appeared (these things are not facts but opinions based on observations). Special witnesses can be qualified as expert witnesses and then the expert witness can give expert opinion evidence. For example, if a witness can show they have special training, knowledge, and experience in the area of forensic pathology, then the witness can testify in court about the cause of death in a homocide case.

The case of R. v. Bingley was to determine whether or not a police officer who has training and is a Drug Recognition Expert can testify in court as an expert witness and provide expert opinion evidence or if the court would have to decide whether or not the officer can provide this expert opinion evidence. In other words, is the police officer an actual expert or was that just the name or word used to describe them.

The Supreme Court confirmed that a DRE's opinion is not automatically admissible at trial (at para 11-12). They then turned to whether a DRE could be qualified as an expert using the leading cases in this area: R. v. Mohan, [1994] 2 SCR 9 and White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., 2015 SCC 23. And at para. 14 the Court summarized:

The expert evidence analysis is divided into two stages. First, the evidence must meet the four Mohan factors: (1) relevance; (2) necessity; (3) absence of an exclusionary rule; and (4) special expertise. Second, the trial judge must weigh potential risks against the benefits of admitting the evidence: White Burgess, at para. 24.

The issue in this case is whether or not a DRE meets the 4th part of the Mohan test, which is special expertise. Mr. Carson Bingley agreed with the other 3 parts of the Mohan test as well as the admissibility analysis as part of the second stage.

The Supreme Court concluded that a DRE does have special expertise and a voir dire (a trial within a trial) is not necessary to determine if the DRE has special expertise or not, in fact, it would be a waste of time (at para. 27-28). But the Court wanted to ensure that evidence beyond the scope of the DRE testing that the witness provides can be scrutinized at para. 29:

It is important to reiterate a DRE’s s. 254(3.1) determination is a result of administering the prescribed evaluation. That is the only expertise conferred on a DRE. The trial judge has an “ongoing duty to ensure that expert evidence remains within its proper scope”: Sekhon, at para. 46. If opinions beyond the expertise of a DRE are solicited, a Mohan voir dire to establish further expertise may be required.

At the same point, the DRE's evidence does not determine guilt or innocence, but it is "merely one piece of the picture for the judge or jury to consider" (at para. 31). 

Related articles

  • Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Anthony-Cook (Joint Recommendations) (MichaelDyck.ca)
  • Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Jordan (Unreasonable Delay) (MichaelDyck.ca)
  • Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Safarzadeh-Markhali (Pre-Sentence Custody Credit) (MichaelDyck.ca)
  • Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. St-Cloud (Tertiary Ground for Bail) (MichaelDyck.ca)
  • Supreme Court of Canada Series: R. v. Nur (Mandatory Minimums for Firearms) (Michael Dyck.ca)
  • Is Marijuana Use Impaired Driving? (MichaelDyck.ca)
  • Maclean's Article Tackles Impaired Driving by Drug Issue (MichaelDyck.ca)

About the author

Michael Dyck is a partner at Rees & Dyck Criminal Defence. He represents clients primarily from Winnipeg, Steinbach, and rural Manitoba. He has extensive experience helping people charged with criminal offences and focuses on building legal strategy with clients. To read more of his articles, please visit his partner's website TomRees.ca.

Tags Supreme Court of Canada, R. v. Bingley, impaired driving law, drive impaired, drug recognition evaluation, marijuana, high driving
Comment

Maclean's Article Tackles Impaired Driving by Drug Issue

October 7, 2016 Michael Dyck
Michael Dyck Macleans

Charlie Gillis just posted an article on Maclean's called "Is Canada ready to deal with stoned drivers?" that tackles the issue of impaired driving by drugs, especially marijuana because of the Federal Liberal Government's position on legalizing recreational marijuana use in 2017.

A large portion of the article focused on a case from Winnipeg, R. v. Manaigre, 2015 MBPC 26, where the Honourable Judge Devine of the Provincial Court of Manitoba articulated a thorough decision on how a Drug Recognition Expert conducts tests on suspected impaired drivers and the shortcomings of these tests. Primary, some parts of the test identify consumption of marijuana and not necessarily impairment.  At para. 81, the Court wrote

Several of the tests sound complicated and very difficult to perform.  I suspect they might well challenge the balance of many completely sober people.

I spoke with Mr. Gillis and voiced some of my concerns about both having impaired drivers on the road (be it from alcohol, drugs, or a combination of both) and also finding a fair and appropriate way of testing the impairment of drivers where the officer suspects the driver has consumed drugs.

Related articles

  • Is Marijuana Use Impaired Driving? (MichaelDyck.ca)
  • Are you guilty? (MichaelDyck.ca)
  • What is the sentencing range for an impaired driving conviction (TomRees.ca)
  • Common questions about driving impaired charges and DUIs (TomRees.ca)

About the author

Michael Dyck is a partner at Rees & Dyck Criminal Defence. He represents clients primarily from Winnipeg, Steinbach, and rural Manitoba. He has extensive experience helping people charged with criminal offences and focuses on building legal strategy with clients. To read more of his articles, please visit his partner's website TomRees.ca.

Tags marijuana, DUI, driving laws, drive impaired, impaired driving law, criminal law, high driving
Comment
Older Posts →

© Michael Dyck, 2012-2024.  All rights reserved.